<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bottomMargin=0 leftMargin=3 rightMargin=3 topMargin=0>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV> Ok I know this
may not interest some of you but...... I thought I'd ask those of you who know
about Playstation & playstation 2. I recently got a Playstation 1 at a yard
Sale for 15.00 I think I got a good deal but don't know a lot about that
sort of thing. I was in at this game store & traded in some of the
games that came with it ( the most they gave me for a used game was 1.00 &
that was a 5 disc set ! ) but anyway they told me they buy Playstation 1's
for 10.00 to resell them. I am thinking I may have gotton a deal because they
resell the games I sold them for 5- 15.00 so if they are doing that with
the games they're sure to sell Playstation 1 for at least 25- 30. right? Hope I
am not boring all of you <EM>& no I do not sit </EM>around & play
video games all the time ! I live on a farmette with lots of grass to mow &
then there's my job..... JUST DIDN'T WANT YOU ALL TO GET THE WRONG IDEA :)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> So does anyone know about Play stations?</DIV>
<DIV> Jeff</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 22:50:01 -0500 <A
href="mailto:gcfl-discuss@gcfl.net">gcfl-discuss@gcfl.net</A> writes:<BR>>
Ever since someone started complaining about the appearance of <BR>>
animosity<BR>> in our discussions, exchange of any thoughts at all has fallen
to <BR>> near<BR>> zero. Could we each contribute something in the next
three days that <BR>> is<BR>> <BR>> a) provocative and interesting
enough to generate a round of <BR>> comments,<BR>> <BR>> and<BR>>
<BR>> b) not of a nature to leave us all feeling mortally offended?<BR>>
<BR>> I have two modest contributions to offer.<BR>> <BR>> 1) I really
enjoyed the list of "Literary Insults" that recently <BR>> came out<BR>>
from GCFL. I liked Lincoln, Reed, Reston and Twain the best.<BR>> <BR>> 2)
I am reading a book called People of the Lake by Richard E. <BR>> Leakey
and<BR>> Roger Lewin, about the beginnings of humankind. One of the
most<BR>> fascinating conclusions so far is that early human existence was
<BR>> anything<BR>> BUT the "nasty, brutish and short" life that 19th
century <BR>> Victorians<BR>> attributed to it. For one thing, hunting
contributed only about 20% <BR>> of<BR>> the human diet, complex social
organization existed, including <BR>> probably<BR>> families. (Many
primates live in bands, but only humans live in <BR>> family<BR>> groups
within bands. In fact, it seems that gatherer-hunter <BR>> societies<BR>>
remaining, almost anywhere in the world, exist in tribal groupings <BR>>
of<BR>> about 500, because that is the number within which new adults can
<BR>> find<BR>> mates without resorting to incest, starting new families.)
Finally,<BR>> people generally could supply all their needs in about three
hours <BR>> work a<BR>> day, even in desert environments -- not the image
of working from <BR>> dawn<BR>> till dusk to scratch out a meagre
survival.<BR>> <BR>>
Siarlys<BR>>
<BR>> <BR>>
________________________________________________________________<BR>> The
best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!<BR>> Surf the Web
up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!<BR>> Only $14.95/ month - visit <A
href="http://www.juno.com/">www.juno.com</A> to sign up today!<BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> GCFL-discuss mailing
list<BR>> <A
href="mailto:GCFL-discuss@gcfl.net">GCFL-discuss@gcfl.net</A><BR>>
info/gcfl-discuss<BR>> <BR>> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>