<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=content-type content=text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2604" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bottomMargin=0 leftMargin=3 topMargin=0 rightMargin=3>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>If I may comment (trying to reply in order):</DIV>
<DIV> What is the full truth? And what
does natural law say about all this? Do you know for a fact that you have the
full truth? Have you seen everything that the courts have seen? What little I've
heard it is amazing how many different "facts" I've heard. Some have said that
she's fully aware, some say she's aware enough to repsond and <EM>tries</EM> to
communicate, others are saying this guy made millions off a lawsuit from the
hospital, a newscast said he won 1 million from that lawsuit. I've heard that
he's been with another lady now for these 15 years and has 3 kids with
her.</DIV>
<DIV> One decision makes him
incompetent? Aren't you desiring to get rid of him because he disagrees with
your opinion? Do you get rid of friends, neighbors, bosses, coworkers, etc
because they don't agree with you?</DIV>
<DIV> I would say the court has all
the facts. And unless they've fully released every single fact that's been
before the court, I'm not sure any individual can say they have all the
facts.</DIV>
<DIV> I think the ones who have the
"best chance of having a clue what's going on" would be the courts. I don't
think we as the public have the full picture or the full facts. IF the courts
have released all the facts, you'd then have to live in Florida to get that
information.</DIV>
<DIV> The only opinions that can
affect this judge would be of the Florida community. Which would imply you are
from Florida, if not your opinion of this judge means less than a Floridian's
opinion. It's their judges, let them take care of it. If you have a billion
people saying they want this judge impeached, but only 500 are from Florida
itself, does it really matter what the other 999,999,500 people say?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I personally don't think the public has all the facts. And if they do they
must be in Florida in the courts listening daily, reading the court papers as
they are released, and doing their research on it via the court system and
ignoring the mass media. If they have
that much time to research this kind of information, they either have nothing
else to do with their life, or are sacrificing something else for this issue...
At which point I would beg the question if it's truly worth it.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>My two cents worth (and probably the most I've posted in ages.)</DIV>
<DIV>God bless you,</DIV>
<DIV>Lance<BR>John 8:32 "You will know the Truth and the Truth will set you
free."<BR></DIV>
<DIV>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 00:17:33 -0700 <A
href="mailto:gcfl-discuss@gcfl.net">gcfl-discuss@gcfl.net</A> writes:<BR>>
Romans832 is your name?<BR>> <BR>> Romans832,<BR>> What is
pathetic?<BR>> As it happens, I do happen to know quite a bit about the
case. And <BR>> not <BR>> from gleaning tidbits from the media, I
assure you.<BR>> A Judge is not to make impartial decisions based on his
beliefs, but <BR>> <BR>> from the truth and natural law.<BR>> I want to
rid the court system of Judge Greer because he has shown <BR>> himself to be
incompetent to hold the position.<BR>> Yes, I disagree with his
decision.<BR>> Who do you think holds the facts? Who has the "best
chance of <BR>> having a <BR>> clue what's going on"?<BR>> And more
importantly, why did my e-mail cause you so much <BR>> irritation?<BR>>
Jeanene<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >Romans832<BR>> ><BR>> >
<BR>> ><BR>> >>>You want to impeach a Judge because of his
beliefs? Give me a <BR>> BREAK! You want to get rid of a person because
you don't agree with <BR>> them? That's a joke. Do you have all the facts
about Terri <BR>> Schiavo's case? Do you think George Greer does?
Who has the best <BR>> chance of having a clue what's going on? WE the PUBLIC
have a <BR>> quarter to fifty percent of the facts. This is pathetic!<BR>>
>>></DIV></BODY></HTML>