In My Humble Opinion = IMHO... MSHO = My Seldom Humble Opinion??<br>~Lance<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/9/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Discussion of the Good, Clean Funnies List</b> <<a href="mailto:gcfl-discuss@gcfl.net">
gcfl-discuss@gcfl.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
<div>Well, one thing does grow out of another. That's what keeps conversation
from getting too boring. I agree that the entire campaign should be limited to a
six month period in the actual election year. But what I have a problem with is
reducing everything to acronyms. It took me a while to figure out IMHO. But
then, I generally refer to MSHO. (The S stands for "seldom.")</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Siarlys</div>
<div> </div>
<div>On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:21:50 -0800 "Discussion of the Good, Clean Funnies
List" <<a href="mailto:gcfl-discuss@gcfl.net" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">gcfl-discuss@gcfl.net</a>>
writes:</div>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-left: 10px; padding-left: 10px;">
<div>My deepest apologies Green!</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I can't believe they're already starting to campaign. IMHO it's way to
early to start and WAY TOO MUCH money is spent on
it.<br>~Lance<br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/9/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Discussion
of the Good, Clean Funnies List</b> <<a href="mailto:gcfl-discuss@gcfl.net" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">gcfl-discuss@gcfl.net</a>>
wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
<div><span><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">if you're going to talk
politics, why not change the subject to reflect that?</font></span></div>
<div>
<p dir="ltr" align="left"><font size="5"><font face="Script"><font color="#0000ff"><span lang="en-us">greenBubble</span>
</font></font></font></p></div><span>
<p dir="ltr">I lean toward John Edwards. He would have been much the best
candidate in 2004, if his "lack of experience" had not been allowed to shove
Kerry to the fore. I suspect he could also have carried a couple of southern
states. Barack Obama may be the more charismatic candidate, and he has about
as much experience as John F. Kennedy did when he ran for president, but I
don't know if the substance is there or not. He is a fine senator, but that
is a different job than president. Among Republicans, I like Chuck Hagel
from Nebraska. </p>
<div> </div>
<div>Siarlys</div></span></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div>