<div dir="ltr">I'm all for Corporations and Rich peeps paying the bulk of the taxes. But how do you do that when the Supreme Court has even ruled that Money is a form of free speech?<br>~Lance<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Discussion of the Good, Clean Funnies List <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gcfl-discuss@gcfl.net">gcfl-discuss@gcfl.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
<div>Lance, I ran across this again while cleaning out old emails. You probably
noticed that McCain is now openly advertising that one difference between him
and Obama is that he will LOWER corporate tax rates, because he thinks that is
the way to restore economic prosperity. There are only three ways to do that:
(1) put additional tax burdens on all the rest of us, (2) borrow huge sums of
money, most of it from overseas, which taxpayers will have to repay with
interest, (3) cut federal spending by an amount equal to the lost revenue from
corporate tax -- and I want to see which budget lines he would cut. Any fool can
talk about cutting "wasteful spending" but nobody want to offer details. Voters
would say, no wait, that's someting I WANT the government to do.</div>
<div>
Siarlys</div>
<div> </div>
<div>On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 23:59:15 -0700 "Discussion of the Good, Clean Funnies
List" <<a href="mailto:gcfl-discuss@gcfl.net" target="_blank">gcfl-discuss@gcfl.net</a>>
writes:</div>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); margin-left: 10px; padding-left: 10px;">
<div dir="ltr">Is Obama as financially savvy as Clinton? Will the Democrats
support such a thing? Will they raise the taxes on Corporations and remove tax
credits so we can return to Corporations paying the bulk of taxes instead of
the lower and middle class?<br>~Lance</div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div>
</div>