[GCFL-discuss] Links to the past

[gcfl-discuss at gcfl.net]

Siarlys, I'd call into question the value of such opinions. Saying it was
a survey-by-mail. Only those who cared to reply did. Which implies there
are huge masses of historians that haven't voiced their opinions! To ease
some questions, it would have been nice if they had said, "Out of X
millions of surveys mailed out only Y replied". Then at least we know
only Y cared or had the desire to participate in such a survey. Or maybe
the # of replies tells us how bogus these historians felt this survey to
be? (Only a critical question, no facts trying to be stated.)

Also, who's to say this group didn't send a letter a head of the survey
stating their goal or hinted strongly at their goal for this survey?
Which might then explain why so many HATE Bush, yet some with dignity
decided they weren't going to let this survey go completely without
someone speaking out in favor for Bush. This is PURE speculation! I in no
way have a clue how it was done. But as a critical thinker must question
the validity of a pole that was mailed out and only accounted for those
who replied. Which says only those who care to reply do.

God bless,
Lance
John 8:32 "You will know the Truth and the Truth will set you free."

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:54:24 -0500 gcfl-discuss at gcfl.net writes:
> There is an excellent review of George W. Bush's place in history 
> at:
> 
> http://www.h-net.org/~hns/articles/2004/092004a.html
> 
> Siarlys
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://gcfl.net/pipermail/gcfl-discuss/attachments/20040929/bc99c0be/attachment.html