[GCFL-discuss] humble opinion

Discussion of the Good, Clean Funnies List gcfl-discuss at gcfl.net
Tue Feb 13 15:33:10 CST 2007


I have a friend who always says..." it's just my humble but accurate opinion!"
given that he's pretty smart, people tend to agree with him.
Carla

  ----- Original Message ----- 

  Subject: Re: [GCFL-discuss] Dead Teenaged Acronyms


  Seldom is correct. Few people who refer to "my humble opinion" are the least bit humble about it. I'm just being direct and honest. (Speaking for myself, it may not be true of everybody).

  Siarlys

  P.S. Of course I always consider that I could be wrong, or, as H.L. Mencken used to reply to any and all critics "you may be right," but as Mike Royko remarked "I doubt it."

  On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 10:39:58 -0800 "Discussion of the Good, Clean Funnies List" <gcfl-discuss at gcfl.net> writes:
    In My Humble Opinion = IMHO... MSHO = My Seldom Humble Opinion??
    ~Lance



    On 2/9/07, Discussion of the Good, Clean Funnies List < gcfl-discuss at gcfl.net> wrote: 
      Well, one thing does grow out of another. That's what keeps conversation from getting too boring. I agree that the entire campaign should be limited to a six month period in the actual election year. But what I have a problem with is reducing everything to acronyms. It took me a while to figure out IMHO. But then, I generally refer to MSHO. (The S stands for "seldom.")

      Siarlys

      On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:21:50 -0800 "Discussion of the Good, Clean Funnies List" <gcfl-discuss at gcfl.net> writes:
        My deepest apologies Green!

        I can't believe they're already starting to campaign. IMHO it's way to early to start and WAY TOO MUCH money is spent on it.
        ~Lance
         
        On 2/9/07, Discussion of the Good, Clean Funnies List <gcfl-discuss at gcfl.net> wrote: 
          if you're going to talk politics, why not change the subject to reflect that?
          greenBubble 

          I lean toward John Edwards. He would have been much the best candidate in 2004, if his "lack of experience" had not been allowed to shove Kerry to the fore. I suspect he could also have carried a couple of southern states. Barack Obama may be the more charismatic candidate, and he has about as much experience as John F. Kennedy did when he ran for president, but I don't know if the substance is there or not. He is a fine senator, but that is a different job than president. Among Republicans, I like Chuck Hagel from Nebraska. 


          Siarlys



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  GCFL-discuss mailing list
  GCFL-discuss at gcfl.net
  http://gcfl.net/mailman/listinfo/gcfl-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://gcfl.net/pipermail/gcfl-discuss/attachments/20070213/b4f9644b/attachment.htm 


More information about the GCFL-discuss mailing list